Today I’d like to air my disappointment, contempt and disgust towards a certain Club that I am unfortunately a member of. Not by choice, mind you. Equally unfortunately, at the risk of being sued, I am unable to reveal the name of this Club (which is not really a club), or why I am a member of this Club despite my obvious odium for this
Club.
My discontentment stems from the double standards practiced by the Club. To illustrate, here are 2 scenarios.
Scenario 1
Member A is found guilty of breaching certain Club rules, and is suspended from the
Club for a period of 3 years. Member A challenges the Club’s decision in a higher forum. The higher forum affirms Member A’s guilt but reduces the sentence to a fine, thus effectively restoring Member A’s membership in the Club.
Disgruntled, Member A sues the Club Management and every other member of the Club who Member A thinks is responsible for Member A’s suspension. Nasty allegations, unwarranted accusations and personal attacks are thrown into Member A’s claim which are all aimed to embarrass, discredit and belittle the Club more than anything else.
Due to the frivolity of Member A’s claim, Member A’s claim is dismissed, and Member A is ordered to pay costs to the Club for having to defend itself against Member A’s claim.
Member A then seeks indulgence from the Club to waive the costs order made against Member A. One would have thought that after all the mud slinging, name calling and damage done to the Club’s reputation by Member A’s claim, the Club would snub Member A’s cry for mercy.
However, in a surprising turn of events, the Club agrees to consider Member A’s request.
Scenario 2
X (a non-club member) sues Member B for using the latter’s position as a member of the Club to cheat X. Within the perimeters of the Club, Member B is found guilty of cheating X and is ousted from the Club.
Under the Club Rules, X is entitled to claim compensation from the Club as a result of Member B’s indiscretion, provided that X complies with the procedures prescribed for making such claims for compensation.
X does make a claim for compensation with the Club, but unfortunately the claim is not in accordance with the prescribed procedures put in place by the Club. The Club therefore does not entertain X’s claim.
Dissatisfied, X files a claim in a higher forum that X is entitled to be compensated by the Club despite not having complied with the Club’s claims procedures.
Obviously, X is unsuccessful in its claim against the Club and is ordered to pay costs to the Club for having to defend itself against X’s claim.
Having paid 80% of the costs to the Club, X seeks the Club’s indulgence to waive the balance 20% of the costs payable to the Club, especially since X has in fact suffered loss at the hands of Member B.
In a surprising turn of events, the Club refuses to indulge X’s request and demands for payment of the balance 20%.
Any fool with half a brain can see that X deserves indulgence and not Member A. So why the double standards? Because Member A is still a member of the Club and thus one of the Club’s own? Because X is not a member of the Club through no fault of its own? (Of course, I must add that the Club claims to stand as a bastion of hope, peace and equality to all and sundry, not just its members).
Either way, I just don’t see the rationale or justification behind the Club’s decisions. I cannot air my grievances directly to the Club because the Club is fully capable of making my life very difficult.
Hence, this blog.